The call for the 42nd Federal Canadian election was issued by the Governor General David Johnston on August 4. The subsequent campaign spanned 78 days from the dissolution of Parliament to the election, one of the longest campaigns in Canadian history. This was also the first time since the 1930 election when a Canadian Prime Minister tried to win a 4th consecutive term in power.
The main parties’ standings at dissolution of the 41st Parliament was 159 seats for the Conservatives, 95 for the NDP, 36 for the Liberals and 2 for the BQ. From the early stages of the election campaign, it was clear that it would be a hard-fought election due to what was considered a 3-way race between the three main federal parties, CPC, PLC and NDP. The NDP, being a front-runner, gave this particular election more enthusiasm as historically the Conservatives and Liberals have always ruled the country.
As the elections campaign persisted, polls were clearly showing that Canadians wanted change after almost a decade of Conservatives rule. In spite of the conservatives’ extensive elections media campaign presenting Mr. Stephan Harper as the best leader for the country, by early September, surveys of Canadians had shown the contrary: they were looking for a new PM. All indications were obviously directing towards a new resident at 24 Sussex Drive in Ottawa, the nations’ capital, on Oct 19.
The three main competing parties, CPC, PLC and the NDP put up strong media campaigns targeting voters with their political platforms. The parties’ leaders wasted no time to present their arguments and points of views over various subjects and topics. This continued until Sept 15 when a Federal Court of Appeal panel dismissed a government appeal over a ban on face coverings at citizenship ceremonies in what amounts to a major policy rebuke of the Harper government. At this point, the election campaign witnessed a sharp spin towards what has been considered by many as ugly and horrible conducts by the Conservatives adopting a very divisive approach and rhetoric in hopes of winning the election.
The Conservative era in the last decade has been overshadowed by controversial policies in many aspects, but mainly by human rights violations under security excuses. The Conservative government ended its ruling period with the very contentious bill C51 and bill C24. Both bills have been considered “ as an attack on constitutional freedoms and an “extraordinary inversion” of the role of judges” and “a two-tiered system in which naturalized Canadians are treated as second-class” .
The election rhetoric based on fear-mongering against women who wear the niqab took over air waves, campaigns, interviews and polls. The campaign turned women’s safety and rights into a political game that distracts from the realities and significant concerns of Canadians. Muslims and Arabs have been problematized as not only a security problem, but as a socio-cultural problem in Canada. The Conservatives thinking they will win more votes from the niqab controversy, sank deeper into their conflict-ridden political campaigns. What made such negative policy bitter is the fact it was run by the prime minister of the country whose main role is to unite Canadians and protect women’s rights.
Muslim Canadians felt and without prior notice that they have been used as a political football for election purposes. The majority of Canadians started to believe that the Muslim community is being used to capitalize on misconceptions and to create fear in the hearts and minds of fellow citizens. As a result, in the midst of the elections movement the xenophobic and Islamophobic sentiments hit a peak and the expected constructive political debates during campaigns turned to be theaters where Islamophobia became a free-for-all scene.
As the election campaign came to its last session, it became clear that the niqab debate that was initiated to the advantage of the Conservatives had back fired. Mr. Harper relied on polls he ordered himself and bet big time on the niqab debate and lost. Canada is a great country by all means. It can’t accept bigotry, hatred and discrimination. Canadians, on Oct 19 2015, made it clear and loud: yes to inclusion no to exclusion. The majority of Canadians chose the Federal political parties that have championed Canadian values of unity, harmony, equality and freedom of choice to represent them in the House of Commons. The election results will send a strong message to those politicians who have pursued campaigns of hate, prejudice, Islamophobia, fear and division amongst Canadians that they have harvested what they have planted, loss and defeat.
Samer Majzoub, Recipient of Queen Elizabeth II Diamond Jubilee Medal ; President of Human right’s advocacy group ; Recipient of many recognition awards.
Le Forum Musulman Canadien dénonce le capital politique cherché par certains partis politiques.
-Pour diffusion immédiate –
(Montréal, le 23 septembre 2015) – Le FMC-CMF déplore le capital politique cherché par certains partis concernant le port du niqab lors du serment de citoyenneté et, qui alimente la peur des musulmans.
« Nous sommes consternés et choqués de voir la position de certains partis politiques s’opposant clairement aux droits et libertés et portant un ton islamophobe envers la communauté musulmane», précise Samer Majzoub, président du FMC.
Le FMC appuie la décision de la Cour d’appel fédérale et salue la position des partis politiques défendant les droits humains et la liberté de choix. « Le FMC adhère et défend fortement les droits et libertés, la liberté d’expression, de convictions et le choix de tous les citoyens de leurs codes vestimentaires», réclame Monsieur Majzoub.
« Le port du niqab lors des cérémonies d’assermentation de citoyenneté n’empêche pas les femmes de révéler leurs identités, par mesure de sécurité, avant de prêter serment», ajoute-il. « La cérémonie d’assermentation est un événement permettant aux « nouveaux citoyens » de jurer fidélité et respect aux lois de leur nouveau pays et nous ne devons empêcher quiconque de prêter un tel serment »
Le nombre de femmes portant le niqab est minime dans la communauté musulmane. Le FMC déplore lamentablement que ce sujet ait pris une proportion non justifiée dans cette campagne fédérale et ait devenu une arme électorale dans les mains des partis qui cherchent un capital politique en alimentant la peur des musulmans.
Kathy Malas : 514 594 1402S
Samah Jebbari : 514 886 8414
– For immediate release –
(Montreal, September 23, 2015) – The Canadian Muslim Forum denounces the political sought by some parties
For Immediate Release – The FMC-CMF deplores the political sought by some parties regarding the wearing of niqab in the oath of citizenship and fueling the fear of Muslims.
“We are appalled and shocked by the position of some political parties that clearly oppose rights and freedoms and carries an Islamophobic tone towards Muslim community,” said Samer Majzoub, CMF’s president.
The CMF supports the decision of the Federal Court of Appeal and welcom the position of the political parties that defend human rights and freedom of choice. “The CMF adheres and strongly promotes the rights and freedoms, liberty of expression, belief and right of all citizens to choose their dress code,” adds Mr. Majzoub.
“The wearing of niqab during citizenship ceremonies does not prevent women to reveal their identities, for security reasons, before taking the oath,” he adds. “The vow in ceremony is an event that allows new citizens to express loyalty and respect for the laws of their new country and should not be prevented from lending such an oath”.
The number of women wearing niqab is minimal in the Muslim community. The CMF lamentably that this subject has taken an unjustified attention in the current Federal election campaign and has become a “weapon” in the hands of parties who seek political gain by fueling the fear of Muslims.
Samer Majzoub: 514 884 0852